Delivered reliability programs across 41 U.S. states and 9 countries since 2007 — every engagement tracked in our internal registry and benchmarked against the MDG Reliability Maturity Index.
Engineering the reliability layer behind the world's most demanding facilities.
Maintenance Design Group is an independent maintenance and reliability engineering firm that designs, implements, and sustains asset-care programs for industrial operators — turning maintenance from a cost center into a measured, data-driven competitive advantage.
An independent maintenance and reliability engineering firm — converting maintenance from a cost center into a measured competitive advantage.
Maintenance Design Group designs, implements, and sustains asset-care programs for industrial operators across food and beverage, pharmaceutical, pulp and paper, petrochemical, and utility sectors. Our work begins where vendor playbooks end: at the asset, the work order queue, the planner's desk, and the capital project PID. We staff every engagement with senior principal engineers — never junior consultants, never offshore analyst handoffs — and we measure what we deliver against your own plant's audited baseline.
The result is a maintenance function that leadership can finally govern with the same rigor as production, quality, and safety: planned work rising to the mid-70s as a percent of total, Mean Time Between Failures extended on critical trains, storeroom accuracy above 96%, and an auditable return profile your CFO can sign off on.
Operating philosophy
- Independent. No software resale, no OEM alliance, no platform to license back to you. Our recommendations are selected against your failure modes, not our channel.
- Senior-only. Every diagnostic, design, and sustainment engagement is led by a principal engineer with 15+ years of plant-floor practice. Junior staff support; they do not lead.
- Measured. We benchmark your program against the proprietary MDG Reliability Maturity Index — the same instrument applied across 600+ North American plants — and we publish ranges, not guarantees.
- Sustained. Implementation timelines for full enterprise programs are quoted honestly at 6+ months. Our 98% retention rate across multi-year managed reliability programs is the proof we outlast the launch.
If you are weighing whether to keep reliability work in-house, hand it to a systems integrator, or commission a diagnostic from an independent firm, the next paragraph is the one to forward to your plant manager and your CFO.
See how we engage →The numbers a VP reads before opening a diagnostic conversation.
Every figure below is sourced from our internal engagement registry (2018–2024 cohort) or our third-party DNV audits. Where a number is a range, we publish the range.
Trusted by 47 F1000 operators — including named engagements with Cargill, Tyson Foods, WestRock, and Dow Chemical. Case studies are available under NDA; anonymized references are open on request.
A 98% retention rate across multi-year managed reliability programs in the 2018–2024 cohort. We do not win on the proposal; we win on the second contract.
Average engagement produces a 5.8x return inside 18 months, verified through independent client-side audits run by the customer's own finance team. We reference audits; we do not promise percentages.
If the figures above match the operating problem on your desk, the next step is a 30-minute Reliability Diagnostic with a senior principal engineer — no sales layer, no deck.
Book a Reliability DiagnosticHow an engagement actually runs.
Every Maintenance Design Group engagement follows a three-phase arc — a measured baseline, a designed program architecture, and a sustained managed reliability practice. The diagnostic call is the entry point; it scopes the baseline, not a multi-year contract.
-
01
Assess — Reliability Maturity Index baseline
We benchmark the site against the proprietary MDG Reliability Maturity Index, scored across 11 domains — work identification, PM optimization, defect elimination, planning & scheduling, materials, skills, condition monitoring, MOC, contractor management, KPI integrity, and leadership cadence. Output: a single maturity score, a delta to best-in-class, and a prioritized gap list. Typically 4–6 weeks on site.
-
02
Design — program architecture, ISO 55000-aligned
We architect the asset-care program: reliability strategy, PM/PdM libraries, defect-handling standards, planning & scheduling workflow, materials strategy, competency matrix, and a KPI tree that survives audit. Aligned to ISO 55000 and audited annually by DNV. Maintainability requirements are written back into the P&IDs for any greenfield scope.
-
03
Sustain — multi-year managed reliability
A senior principal engineer embedded alongside your team, monthly maturity re-scoring, quarterly steering reviews, and a rolling 90-day action plan. Measured on OEE lift, unplanned downtime reduction, and audited ROI — not on hours billed. 98% of clients who reach this phase stay multi-year.
The diagnostic call is the entry point. It scopes phase one — no multi-year commitment on the first call.
Book a Reliability Diagnostic →Six industrial sectors. One reliability discipline.
We work where unplanned downtime is measured in revenue, regulatory exposure, and public safety — not in calendar days. Each sector brings a different failure mode and a different cost curve. The methodology is constant; the engineering is not.
Food & Beverage
Sanitary PM/PdM programs, allergen-bearing line changeovers, filler and packaging line reliability, cold-chain compressor integrity. Typical pain: scheduling PM against continuous shift coverage without throwing OEE into the floor.
- Filler & packaging line availability
- Sanitary condition-monitoring standards
- Sanitation-to-startup defect handoff
Pharmaceutical & Medical
GMP-critical asset qualification, deviation-prevention reliability, validated PM, cleanroom-compatible monitoring. Typical pain: reconciling FDA documentation cadence with maintenance records on the same equipment.
- Validated PM in GMP scope
- Deviation-root-cause integration
- Audit-ready maintenance records
Pulp & Paper
Recovery boiler integrity, refiner reliability, dryer section uptime, lime kiln availability. Typical pain: balancing turnaround windows against seasonal grade changes on a machine that doesn't stop cleanly.
- Recovery & power boiler integrity
- Refiner & machine uptime programs
- Turnaround scope optimization
Petrochemical & Refining
PSM-aligned reliability, rotating equipment programs, fixed equipment RBI, instrumented protective systems. Typical pain: getting reliability improvements past operations review without re-triggering MOC churn.
- PSM/Mechanical integrity alignment
- RBI & fixed-equipment programs
- SIS & protective function integrity
Utilities & Power
Generating fleet reliability, T&D substation asset management, water/wastewater pumping integrity, NERC-aligned documentation. Typical pain: defending a reliability budget against regulator-driven capex cycles.
- Fleet EFOR & critical-Asset programs
- Substation & transformer strategy
- NERC documentation alignment
Heavy & Discrete Manufacturing
CNC uptime, stamping & press reliability, paint-line defect elimination, robotic cell OEE. Typical pain: chasing the same chronic failure across multiple cells without converging on a root cause class.
- Chronic-failure elimination
- Robotic & CNC availability programs
- Production-line OEE lift
Anonymized engagements. Audited numbers.
Most of our enterprise clients operate under NDA; the engagements below are representative, anonymized, and verified through the client's own finance or operations audit team. Numbers are reported as ranges where individual plant conditions vary.
Large packaged-food manufacturer, six plants, Midwest & South
Problem. Filler-line availability collapsing through 3rd shift; PM compliance at 41% on packaging assets; sanitation-to-startup defects driving 12–18% of weekly waste.
Intervention. Reliability Maturity Index baseline across all six plants in 11 weeks; redesign of PM/PdM library against FMEA; embedded planner-coach program; weekly defect-elimination cadence with plant reliability leads.
Outcome. OEE up 11.4 points on the pilot plant within 14 months; unplanned downtime cut 52% across the network. Audited 5.6x ROI at month 16.
Multi-site pharmaceutical manufacturer, eight oral-solid-dose facilities
Problem. Maintenance records failing FDA inspection review; PM scope drifting across sites; deviation backlog sitting with engineering for an average of 47 days.
Intervention. Single validated PM standard deployed across all eight sites; deviation root-cause analysis integrated into the maintenance work-order closeout; reliability maturity re-scored quarterly by site.
Outcome. Maintenance-driven deviations down 61% across the network; PM compliance held above 94% under audit. Client-side finance audit verified a 5.8x ROI at month 17. Engagement entered year-three sustain.
Northeast U.S. investor-owned utility, 14 generating units
Problem. Forced outage rate eroding 7-year reliability trend; rotating equipment program fragmented across business units; no common root-cause taxonomy across the fleet.
Intervention. Fleet-wide Reliability Maturity Index baseline in 9 weeks; unified rotating-equipment strategy with vibration, lubrication, and thermography standards; cross-fleet defect-elimination board.
Outcome. EFOR improved 9.1 points across the peaking fleet; forced outage rate down 43%. Sustain phase extended through 2026; recognized with the client's internal Operational Excellence award.
Named Fortune 500 engagements are available under NDA. Reference audits and redacted case files provided during a Reliability Diagnostic.
View full case dossier →